Its laser backlight is something I’ve not seen on such a small projector, helping with colour intensity and shadow detail. While smart projectors seem to be getting brighter and bigger with each new version, the Anker Nebula Capsule 3 Laser is something of a return to the good old days: a projector little bigger than a can of beer that can go everywhere. Sound An 8W Dolby Digital speaker provides enough sound power to fill a room.Media streaming Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV+, Disney+, Paramount+ and NOW installed Netflix can be sideloaded.Full HD picture Uses XPR technology to upscale the DLP DMD chip to 1920 x 1080.The Principal Advisor should assist candidates to nominate a chair and/or reviewers, who will be endorsed by the DHDR. For Principal Advisors, due dates for candidates under their supervision are available through the Academic Portal (UQ Researchers) or their Individual Activity Profile. A candidate can view their Progress Review due dates through my.UQ. The HDR Candidate is responsible for organising each progress review in consultation with their advisory team. Candidates and their advisory teams are advised to consult local AOU guidelines to determine when a presentation will be required. Some AOUs will require candidates to deliver a presentation as part of one or more progress review meetings. Both the candidate and the advisory team will be given the opportunity to meet separately with the panel if they wish to do so. The progress review meeting provides the candidate and their advisory team with an opportunity to discuss the candidate’s professional development, research progress and other issues (if any) that need to be addressed. Project documents should be submitted to iThenticate prior to submission. candidate statement, Individual Development Plan (IDP) and Portfolio of Activity), and (b) project documents specified by the AOU. The review documents will consist of: (a) candidature documents (i.e. Specific AOU guidelines for each review can be found at: [Grad School web page link to come.Ĭandidates will submit review documents by the census date for the research quarter in which the review is due. Some Academic Organisational Units (AOUs) may also require candidates to deliver a presentation as part of the progress review. Advisors are not part of the review panel but are involved in the ECC and all Progress Reviews and will provide feedback on the candidate’s progress to support the evaluation and development of the candidate.Įach HDR progress review consists of work submitted by the candidate followed by a meeting with the candidate. The panel may consist of one individual who fulfills the role of both the Chair and reviewer, but a panel of at least two individuals is preferred wherever possible. A PRP will consist of a Chair and/or at least one reviewer. Progress Reviews are undertaken by a Progress Review Panel (PRP) created to support the candidate. Progress reviews play an important role in ensuring that the academic development and progress of the candidate and their project remain on track, and that resourcing and advisory support are adequate.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |